Cybersquatting

EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions EAGLE HOSP. PHYSICIANS, LLC V. SRG CONSULTING, INC. (U.S. 11th Circuit) – In a cybersquatting action, terminating sanctions and default judgment against Defendant are affirmed where: 1) Defend ant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated; 2) evidence supported findings of bad faith when an employee of Defendant intercepted e-mail communications between Plaintiff and its counsel and refused to testify regarding how he did so; and 3) the court did not violate Defendant ‘s due process in ordering sanctions